Ceyhan Fertilizer Plant

Toros Tarım · fertilizer · Ceyhan
iz · TR-MRV-Bench v0.4
toros-ceyhan
Issued: 2024

1 · Facility identity

Company / operator
Toros Tarım
Plant name
Ceyhan Fertilizer Plant
Sector (CBAM scope)
fertilizer
Location
Ceyhan, Türkiye
Nameplate capacity
821,700 t/y

2 · Emission figures (tCO₂)

Audit-grade Scope 1 · 2024
203,840
disclosure · allocated · tsrs_assured
cf-corrected formula (leave-one-plant-out)
376,674
cap × route-EF × cf (formula within +84.8% of audit)
EU CBAM default value
657,360
(EU default overstates by +222%)

95% conformal prediction interval (global, n=21 calibration): 221,992 – 639,136 tCO₂. Restricted to fertilizer-integrated stratum: 275,468 – 515,062 tCO₂ (subject to small-n undercoverage).

3 · Source citation for audit-grade Scope 1

Tekfen Holding 2024 TSRS p18 × cap 0.8M/3.3M

Allocated from Toros group by capacity share 24.2%. AN/CAN.

4 · Methodology (cf-corrected formula)

The headline method is a closed-form physics baseline: Scope 1 ≈ nameplate capacity × route emission-factor × capacity factor, using only operator-published numbers. It is evaluated leave-one-plant-out: each plant's route emission-factor is derived only from the other audit-grade plants in its route, so no plant contributes to its own prediction. Headline: +82.3% log-MAE reduction vs the EU CBAM default across the 19 validatable plants (of 21 audit-grade; two single-plant routes — N₂O-controlled and blender fertilizer — cannot be independently validated and are excluded). External validity: the same formula on 372 EUTL-verified EU cement installations gives a median ratio ≈1.0 vs the EU default's ≈2.5×. An optional in-browser WebGPU model (iz) is shipped as a demo only; it does not beat this formula at current data scale. Independent satellite cross-check (Beirle et al. 2023, ESSD): colocated TROPOMI NOx source within 6.0 km, flux 0.113 ± 0.052 kg NOx/s.

5 · Verifier checklist

  1. ☐ Confirm Scope 1 line item in the cited source matches the value above (tCO₂ basis; not CO₂-equivalent if different).
  2. ☐ Verify operator's verification statement (ISO 14064-1 / TSRS / financial audit) attached to the source.
  3. ☐ Cross-check capacity against latest published cement / steel / aluminum / fertilizer association registry.
  4. ☐ If using the formula prediction as input to a CBAM Article 4(2) actual-emission declaration: it is a model estimate, not a measurement. Verifier must independently support the underlying activity data.
  5. ☐ Confirm the conformal prediction interval covers the operator's claimed Scope 1.

6 · License and citation

TR-MRV-Bench v0 is Apache-2.0 licensed. The benchmark, methodology, and per-facility data are public at github.com/abgnydn/iz and iz-mrv.pages.dev. Cite: Günaydın (2026), "TR-MRV-Bench: a public per-facility emissions benchmark for Turkish CBAM-scope industry, with a physics baseline that beats the EU CBAM default by +82.3% (leave-one-plant-out, n=19)."